What *another* camera? Part 2: All out on OM

This is a long and detailed post about photography (macrophotography specifically), you can skip this if you're not interested. 

A year ago I bought an Olympus TG-6 camera for macro photography (What *another* camera? Olympus TG-6 review). This pocket camera has turned out to be a very good buy and I've used it more and more, often in preference to my full Sony macrophotography setup due to convenience. It's the first "Olympus" camera I've ever owned, although Olympus cameras ceased to exist a few years ago and the rights were bought by an entirely new company, OM Systems (but if you say OM to non-photographers you get blank looks, so people still call them Olympus - don't tell the lawyers). Over the last year OM kit has gone from strength to strength, particularly in macrophotography, while Sony has dropped the ball to some extent and is now about the only camera company not to introduce in-camera focus stacking. This is a shame as I've got a big investment in Sony cameras but I've finally given up waiting. 

The Technical Bit: Digital cameras with 35mm sensors are referred to as full frame (the same size as photographic film). As sensors improved, a new smaller sensor format emerged, APS-C. The advantage of these smaller sensors is that the cameras, and in particular the lenses, can be smaller and lighter. An even smaller format, micro four thirds, was released by Olympus and Panasonic nearly 20 years ago, allowing even smaller and lighter systems. There is a price to pay. Smaller sensors are less efficient at light gathering than big sensors and so micro four thirds cameras are light hungry.

As I get older (don't tell anyone) equipment weight becomes a more important consideration for me, although this is secondary to the value of in-camera focus stacking, which a year with the TG-6 has convinced me about. The OM flagship system is the OM-1 with the M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm f3.5 Macro IS PRO lens, and macro photographers are achieving stunning results with this, but for me it has two problems. My equipment-buying philosophy is to buy good condition used kit from reliable resellers, generally one or two models down from the lastest top of the line models. This generally costs a third to half the price of the latest shiny kit and has served me well over the years. The 90mm macro lens isn't generally available second hand yet and a new OM-1/90mm setup is three thousand quid. No. There's an even bigger (literally) problem. The OM-1/90mm setup is almost the same size and weight as my Sony system, so the only advantage is the focus stacking. 

So I bought a used OM-5 and M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro lens. The price was much more reasonable and the weight (610g) is half the weight of my Sony kit (1077g). Coming from the Sony FE 90mm F2.8 Macro lens the OM 60mm feels like a toy, but certainly doesn't behave like one. Inevitably, having changed manufacturers, there were all sorts of extra bits I had to buy - batteries, filters, etc. This was expected, but then I hit a problem. My Godox flash (Sony version) didn't work with the OM-5. I wasn't sure about this but sadly these things all have proprietary fittings. As I said, micro four thirds sensors are light hungry, macrophotography even more so, thus a new OM-compatible flash was an unavoidable extra expense. 

All photographers moan about camera menu systems but after a year with the TG-6 I thought I'd be OK with the switch to the OM-5. In fact, it proved to be a pretty steep learning curve and I'm still dialling in on the best settings for me. The 60mm macro lens is pretty good, although for my needs it lacks a little bit of magnification so I'm pushing it further with some add-ons. The micro four thirds sensor imaging area is 17.3x13mm and the maximum magnification of the 60mm lens is 1:1. Adding a Raynox DCR150 lens gives 1:1.3 magnification (13mm long subject area) and a Raynox DCR250 gives 1:1.5 (11mm subject area). I can increase this more with extension tubes. 

I've still got a way to go practicing with this new setup but I'm getting there. It seems to work (click for larger image):