Saturday, 1 August 2026

Entomology Update - July 2026

In spite of the terrifying weather, July was an outstanding month for butterflies. With everything brown and crispy after record breaking heat and drought, most species are now struggling, but careful detective work has turned up a decent list of new species (below). 


As I keep saying, DNA is the future, like it or not. Obviously not without problems but fortunately, there are some no-brainers.


Cann, A. (2026) The Softly Singing Spider. British Arachnological Society Newsletter, 166, 9. 

Notable Finds

Centrodora amoena, first record for VC55
Gastrancistrus compressus, first record for VC55
Copidosoma cyaneum, first record for VC55
Gonatopus lunatus, first record for VC55
Hemiptarsenus ornatus, first record for VC55
Meraporus graminicola, first record for VC55
Aeolothrips albicinctus, first record for VC55
Euconomelus lepidus, first records for VC55
Omalus puncticollis, first record for VC55
Trichopria crassifemur, first record for VC55

News from Elsewhere

A nineteenth century reflection of the current AI panic.

Using DNA barcodes from parasitoid wasps, the estimated total number of insect species just jumped three-fold to 20 million. Considering how little we actually know, the true total is likely to be even higher (depending on what you regard as a species of course). 

Bronze Shieldbug nymph, Troilus luridus


Monday, 27 July 2026

The Softly Singing Spider

 Cann, A. (2026) The Softly Singing Spider. British Arachnological Society Newsletter, 166, 9.

The Softly Singing Spider
click for larger image



Tuesday, 14 July 2026

DNA no-brainers

As I keep saying, DNA is the future, like it or not. Obviously not without problems but fortunately, there are some no brainers, like these two: 


Spider Webs as Efficient Passive Samplers for Airborne Fungal eDNA
Researchers have used spider webs as passive environmental DNA (eDNA) samplers for detecting the pathogenic fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, the causal agent of ash dieback.

Spider Webs as Efficient Passive Samplers for Airborne Fungal eDNA in Forests: A Case Study With Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. (2026) Environmental DNA, 8(3), e70315. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70315Digital Object Identifier (DOI)


DNA barcodes should be an esential component of all species descriptions for invertebrates
There are two good things about this paper. First is a nice clear definition of the term "dark taxa" - hyperdiverse species-rich groups of small, inconspicuous organisms that remain undescribed and difficult to delimit using morphology alone.
The second is a highly sensible proposal. I've played a little with the BOLD DNA database and it suffers from one big problem - some of the original species identifications are dodgy, hence the results get fuzzy. If all new species description had to include a DNA barcode, we could start to unpick the dark taxa, something we're never going to be able to do with morphology alone. 

Toward scalable species descriptions for dark taxa: the role of molecular data. ZooKeys 1283 (2026): 297. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1283.172693






Wednesday, 1 July 2026

Entomology Update - June 2026

I've given two talks this month on "The little things that rule the world - the Insect Apocalypse" ( I'm happy to give this talk to your group if you would like) but I've also spent time trying to rustle up an extra 500 species for the Rutland Water 5,000 in 50 challenge. Unfortunately, a planned visit for the Rutland Water Bioblitz was postponed due to extreme heat, which curtailed my activities. 


Struggling with the problem of dark taxa.  

Psallus season is here and with it lots of dissections to confirm IDs. I was asked to produce a short guide of the method I use, so here it is. 

Visiting a local Oak proves worthwhile. 

Murder in the flowerbed.


Notable Finds

Homoporus gibbiscuta, first record for VC55
Reptalus quinquecostatus, first record for VC55


News from Elsewhere

Data from the UK Pollinator Monitoring Scheme (PoMS) shows that Hoverflies declined by around a third in both their abundance and number of species recorded across GB between 2017-2024, signalling possible risks to the health of our ecosystems. 

A fascinating paper - before there were microplastics, the artist Hubert Duprat showed that caddisfly larvae will make jewelled casings from pearls, diamonds and tiny rods of gold. 


Marmalade Hoverfly, Episyrphus balteatus



Sunday, 28 June 2026

Carnage in a flower pot

I spotted some strange Hymenopteran goings on on the side of a flower pot on my patio. On investigating, I found this female Common Black Spider Wasp, Anoplius nigerrimus, trying to fly with a large female Common Fox Spider, Alopecosa pulverulenta, considerably heavier than herself up under the rim of the pot. 

Potter Spider Wasp, Auplopus carbonarius

The excellent BWARS account for this species makes clear that they aren't too fussy about nesting spots. I interrupted her for a quick portrait, then put her back by the pot with the babyfood (which was done for, having already been paralysed). 

Common Fox Spider, Alopecosa pulverulenta




A visit to Turkey

I was nudged recently to go and sample my local Turkey Oak, a mature specimen in a nearby park. Psallus spp aren't the easiest bugs to identify, but knowing the food plant can help. There are at least four  Psallus spp which feed on Turkey Oak, although one doesn't seem to have spread beyond London at present. We have three species in Leicestershire: Psallus anaemicus, Psallus helenae and Psallus pardalis.  I was successful in finding two of these, P. anaemicus and P. helenae

Even better, I was able to find some interesting wasps (all wasps are interesting, but some are more interesting than others)! Cecidostiba fungosa and Sycophila biguttata are both parasitoids of various Oak galls causers, so finding them in a Turkey Oak was good. Trissolcus cultratus, a Shieldbug parasitoid, is now starting to turn up in multiple samples. After months of slog, a picture of parasitoid frequency, although still sketchy due to lack of data. 

Cecidostiba fungosa, Sycophila biguttata, Trissolcus cultratus





Tuesday, 2 June 2026

How to turn the lights on

Platygaster spp

I stumbled across a paper by Jess Awad, an entomologist specializing in parasitoid wasps (Untangling host specialization in a "double dark taxa" system. (2025) Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 118(3), 206-219. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saaf003).  I've been frustrated by my inability to identify Platygastrine wasps to species level, so this struck a chord. (I know I'm not alone in this!) Platygastridae are parasitoids of gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Both they and their hosts are exceptionally abundant and speciose, and both are also "dark taxa, whose species identification and ecological associations are obscured by a history of taxonomic confusion and neglect". To paraphrase Awad et al: Although some Platygastridae exploit other hosts, the majority of species attack gall midges. The gall midge parasitoids, all classified in the subfamily Platygastrinae, include more than 1,800 described species. Taxonomic progress is stymied by a few genera which are both remarkably species-rich and morphologically difficult to distinguish.  Chief among these is the genus Platygaster. With nearly 700 described species, it is the largest genus in the subfamily and even in the whole superfamily Platygastroidea. Platygaster has no morphological gotcha and is always placed at the end of keys, being defined by a lack of distinguishing features. Gall midges are the most diverse group of flying insects, with worldwide estimates in excess of one million species. It is therefore unsurprising that their parasitoids are similarly dominant. Hence "double dark taxa". 

The affinities of all the beings of the same class have sometimes been represented by a great tree. I believe this simile largely speaks the truth. Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species (1859)

This came a day after I'd discovered a new metaphor - the bush of life (Cruaud et al (2024) The Chalcidoidea bush of life: evolutionary history of a massive radiation of minute wasps. Cladistics, 40(1), 34-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12561). Chalcidoidea are an enormously diverse group of parasitoid wasps with an estimated 500,000 species, one of nature's most species-rich groups. The Chalcidoidea originated in the Jurassic period approximately 174 million years ago. This coincides with an important fossil record signal: major diversifications within Chalcidoidea aligned with increases in insect family diversity overall. A shift toward plant-feeding hosts corresponds with the "Angiosperm Terrestrial Revolution" - the rise of flowering plants, which dramatically reshaped terrestrial ecosystems around 130 million years ago. All of this places conventional taxonomic approaches under unbearable strain, and hence gives rise to dark taxa. The "tree of life" analogy breaks down and the explosive radiation of the Chalcidoidea to match their hosts is better represented by the idea of "a bush of life". However, I would suggest that considering that many of the hosts also represent dark taxa, what we're actually talking about here is "the shrubbery of life".  The only practical way out if this mess is going to be via DNA, like it or not. 

I've already dabbled in DNA barcoding but it becomes clear very quickly that much of the existing data is blighted by misidentification of the material examined. The approach of Awad et al is to remove some of the uncertainty by rearing parasitoids from hosts and then barcoding - good old-fashioned Victorian entomology! The snag with Cecidomyiidae is that they are difficult to rear as many species require living host tissue to complete development. I'm very much not an expert in rearing insects - all the parasitoids I've attempted to rear turn out to be unparasitised hosts and all the other species I've attempted turn into Ichneumons!  I'm clearly going to have to do more dabbling with rearing parasitoids from plant galls, probably leaning heavily on my friends who are much more knowledgeable about plant galls than me. 





Monday, 1 June 2026

Entomology Update - May 2026

Still too cold for much entomology at the start of the month then too hot! A late season generally, many species still immature when in recent years they have been adults. 


I've been asked several times recently about how I take photographs of parasitic wasps, so here are the nerdy details of my current setup. 

Notable Finds

Tetramesa fulvicollis, 1st record for VC55
Omphale lugens, 1st record for VC55
Leiophron apicalis, 1st record for VC55


Leiophron apicalis



Thursday, 14 May 2026

Parasitica photography

Parasitica Photography

I've been asked several times recently about how I take photographs of parasitic wasps, so here are the details of my current setup:
  • Specimens: preserved in 70% alcohol, suspended in clear alcohol hand gel in a small transparent lid covered with a coverslip. 
  • Microscope: Brunel SP300 compound trinocular microscope, using 2.5X, 4X, 10X or 20X objectives as appropriate. 
  • Camera: Sony a7Rii.
  • Lighting: Dual gooseneck LED plus two Ikea Jansjö LED lamps, diffused by a cylinder of white kitchen towel. 
  • Post-processing: Focus stacked with Helicon Focus, processed with Canva Affinity. 
Parasitica Photography


See: Cann, A. (2025) Fine Details: Tips for improving specimen photography. Br. J. Ent. Nat. Hist. 38: 199-206.
 



Friday, 1 May 2026

Entomology Update - April 2026

Spring is here but with night time frosts and the now common spring drought which will shape the rest of the year.


New Arachnid Recording Schemes Atlas
A exemplar of how to make biological records available.  

A happy accident. 

I'm afraid so...

It's a specialist interest I have to admit, but what's the deal hymenopterists - why the reluctance to dissect?

Finessing focus stacking
I've been experimenting to see if I can improve the quality of microscope images I generate. The answer is - yes ... but ...


Notable Finds
Mesopolobus aequus, 1st record for VC55
Cryptoserphus dilatus, 1st record for VC55

News from Elsewhere

A new research paper looking at pesticide residues in bird feathers in Leicestershire and elsewhere finds that:
  • Every single feather sample tested contained measurable levels of pesticides. 
  • On average, samples contained more than 5 different pesticides. 
  • Despite being banned for outdoor agricultural use in 2018, neonicotinoids were frequently detected.

Torymus rubi



Thursday, 16 April 2026

Finessing focus stacking

I've been experimenting to see if I can improve the quality of microscope images I generate. The answer is - yes I can, but is it worth it?

DxO recently released their DxO PureRAW 6 image processing software. There are lots of reviews on YouTube if you'd like to know more. I downloaded a free trial copy and compared three different focus stacking variations. I'm not the first person to do this, just documenting it here in case it's useful to you:

  1. Capture jpeg images in camera, focus stack with Helicon Focus, post-process with Affinity Photo. This is the standard method I have used until now. 
  2. Capture raw (.ARW) images in camera, focus stack with Helicon Focus, post-process with Affinity Photo. Helicon will stack raw image files, so I tested this.
  3. Capture raw (.ARW) images in camera, process with DxO PureRAW 6, focus stack with Helicon Focus, post-process with Affinity Photo. 

The results:

click for larger image

At this level, no real difference, and I need to pixel peep at 100% magnification to see the differences:

click for larger image

There is an improvement in quality from method 1 -> 2 -> 3. But what is the cost? 
  • To make a focus stack using ~40 jpeg images typically takes me something like 15 minutes (sample processing, image capture, focus stacking, post processing). 
  • Using raw images, Helicon stacking increases from 10 seconds to 240 seconds, the whole process taking ~20 minutes. 
  • Processing with the sparkly new DxO DeepPRIME XD3 algorithm before stacking takes about 10 minutes, the whole process then taking ~30min. Although Helicon can output a raw (.DNG) image, DxO will only accept original images so it is necessary to batch process captured images before stacking rather than process a single stacked image. The more images, the longer it takes - I estimate making a stack with 100 images would take over an hour from start to finish. This isn't necessarily hands-on time, DxO will happily batch process in the background while I do something else, e.g. prepare the next specimen and capture the images. Sadly it's not possible to process the DNG file Helicon can put out - DxO processing really has to be the first stage of the workflow after image capture. 

There is an improvement in resolution dropping DxO into the workflow at the cost of much longer processing time. Leaving aside the cost of the DxO software, is it worth it? Not for routine images where I'm just documenting an ID. But on occasion, yes, maybe the extra quality is useful. 





Tuesday, 14 April 2026

Teeny-tiny wasp willies

Torymus rubi male

I recently encountered Torymus rubi for the first time. It was on the host plant (Rubus) and with some help, I was able to get a definitive ID. Not all species in the Torymidae are so straightforward however. This brought up again the question of why hymenopterists seem so reluctant to use gen det to confirm difficult species. One paper describes Torymus male genitalia (Klymenko, S. (2012) Morphological Characteristics of Male Genitalia in Some Species in the Genus Torymus. Zoodiversity, 46(2), e-41). I have to admit, some are rather similar, and this paper only covers a few species. Fortunately, the T. rubi aedeagus is quite distinctive:

Torymus rubi aedeagus

It's not a particularly difficult dissection, given the size of the insect. So what's the deal hymenopterists - why the reluctance to dissect?

 



Sunday, 12 April 2026

He's only gone and bought *another* camera

OM1 vs OM5

In the year since I've had my Olympus OM5 camera I've become increasingly impressed with it. It's smaller and lighter than my previous Sony setup and the results are great. I was so impressed that I invested in the OM 90mm macro lens, selling the 60mm lens I originally bought with the OM5. I've developed a workflow for focus stacking which produces results I'm delighted with. However, there is one problem. As my system (and the quality of the results) has grown, so has the weight. The (absolutely brilliant) Cygnustech flying nun diffuser does the business, but it is cumbersome and a bit fragile, and I'm not keen on bashing the expensive 90mm lens around in the field. So I took the plunge and have invested in two complementary systems. 

Studio macro setup:

  • OM System OM-1
  • OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm f3.5 Macro IS PRO lens
  • +/- Olympus M.Zuiko 1.4x Teleconverter MC-14
  • +/- Raynox DCR-250/DCR150
  • Godox V860IIIO flash
  • Cygnustech flying nun diffuser

Fantastic, but here's the problem - this setup is a bit fragile, and weighs 1,830g. I don't want to drag that around with me outdoors, so...

Outdoor macro setup:

  • OM System OM-5
  • Olympus M. Zuiko 60 mm f/2.8 MSC ED Macro lens
  • Olympus FL-LM3 Flash
  • bit of packaging foam for a diffuser
This setup weighs 730g - 60% lighter and much more compact that the OM1 setup. In addition I have the option of adding a Raynox DCR-250/DCR150 if needed (I can't see me using this much outdoors), plus the lightweight Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 (if I need reach). I suspect the convenience of this means it will also get used for quite a lot of quick snaps indoors! The teeny tiny FL-LM3 flash is great - no batteries as it works off the camera battery - although the recycle time is slow (2-3 seconds), which catches me out occasionally. 

And if even the OM5 is too much, I'll still be using my Olympus TG-6  for record shots and my iPhone (for landscapes). As ever, all this kit was bought used from trusted resellers (and guaranteed). Was the step up to the OM1 worth it? I'm still dialling in optimum settings and getting used to the camera, but first indications are favourable - focus stacks seem to be a step up from the OM5. 

 

 




Saturday, 11 April 2026

Platycheirus ambiguus

Platycheirus ambiguus
 I may have bought a new camera (more on that soon), but I am by no means a Dipterist. Convenient then that when I took a turn round the garden to test the new kit that the very first thing I photographed happened to be Platycheirus ambiguus. Although not rare, this small hoverfly could not be described as common either, although the reason for that is almost certainly the small size (6mm). A happy accident. 

 


Thursday, 9 April 2026

New Arachnid Recording Schemes Atlas

Arachnid Recording Schemes Atlas

The British Arachnological Society recording schemes atlas has had a long awaited revamp and is now available, with 1.6 million UK Spider, Harvestmen and Pseudoscorpion records to play with. The new atlas is fantastic, with many ways to slice and dice the data. It's taken a huge amount of work to get to this and the team behind it are to be congratulated. It would be fantastic if all recording schemes could make their data available like this.

 

 


Tuesday, 7 April 2026

A troublesome wasp

 Update: it's Mesopolobus aequus - got there on the 4th attempt!

Wasp

For the last month I have been finding specimens of a chalcid wasp by beating Lawson Cypress and other ornamental conifers. It is one of the Pteromalidae, a real ragbag of a family in desperate need of taxonomic revision - "a polyphyletic dumping ground of taxa that do not obviously fit within previously established families of Chalcidoidea" (Burks, R., et al (2022) From hell’s heart I stab at thee! A determined approach towards a monophyletic Pteromalidae and reclassification of Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). Journal of Hymenoptera Research, 94, 13-88) (glad it's not just me!).  I've had several goes at keying out these wasps, getting a different, moderately unsatisfactory answer each time. Along the way I have eliminated a few possibilities, and my most recent attempt strongly suggests that it is Macromesus amphiretus. It has all the characteristics of this species:
  • Prepectus extremely small, hardly or not detectable. 
  • Lower face with additional vertical groove parallel to genal groove. 
  • Antennal formula of female 11173 (male 11172).
  • Tarsi of female heteromerous, fore and hind tarsi five, mid tarsi four-segmented; first segment of mid tarsi in female very long.
  • Both mandibles with three teeth.
All good - except for the fact that the hind margin of the propodeum does not match any of the three illustrations for this species I have been able to find. This would be a huge problem, were it not for the fact that each of the three illustrations is different! I am therefore inclined to call it Macromesus amphiretus, unless I can find an expert to tell me otherwise. 

Propedium



Graham, MWR de V. (1969) The pteromalidae of north-western Europe (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea). Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Ent.) Suppl. 16.
 
Boucek, Z. & Rasplus, J.Y. (1991) Illustrated key to west-paleartic genera. INRA Editions, série Techniques et Pratiques. ISBN 2-7380-0343-5.

 

Wednesday, 1 April 2026

Entomology Update - March 2026

Some warm spring days but plenty of frosts - a varied month with the season moving on.


Field observations of cyclic metamorphosis in entomology.  

We're drowning in tiny wasps. With some help I've figured out what's going to happen next. 

Apolygus - simplified
Apolygus is a tricky genus, but the impact of a new paper (if widely accepted) simplifies things.

Notable Finds

Asaphes vulgaris - first record for VC55
Euplectrus bicolor - first record for VC55
Psilocera obscura - first record for VC55

News from Elsewhere

We all know it's been wet, but how wet exactly?

Urban Spiders
A new paper shows that Steatoda nobilis and Zygiella x-notata typically made up more than 80% of the urban spiders in an Irish survey.

It's not the reason we thought!


Oak Beauty, Biston strataria




Thursday, 26 March 2026

Apolygus - simplified

Apolygus spinolae
 
Apolygus is a tricky genus, but the impact of a new paper (if widely accepted) on that British list is that Apolygus lucorum and Apolygus spinolae are genetically indistinguishable with A. spinolae as the valid name for the 'two' species. 
As a confirmed taxonomic lumper, I approve! 


Namyatova, A. A., Dzhelali, P. A., & Bolshakova, D. S. (2026) Integrative delimitation of Apolygus (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae: Mirinae) species known from Russia with the emphasis on Apolygus lucorum and Apolygus spinolae having trans-Palearctic distribution. Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny, 84, 47-93. https://doi.org/10.3897/asp.84.e161376
 
 
 

Sunday, 22 March 2026

Swamped with Spangles

Neuroterus quercusbaccarum
 
Over the last week we have been swamped with these tiny wasps. They're all over the inside of the windows and the car, and the moth trap was full of them. It wasn't hard to figure out they were gall wasps, but I generally draw the line at Cynipoidea - they are extremely difficult to identify unless reared directly from the gall. Fortunately my good friends the VC55 gall experts were able to help and to point me at some excellent resources, particularly Oak-galls in Britain by Robin Williams. This allowed me to confirm that these are the Common Spangle Gall Wasp, Neuroterus quercusbaccarum

Cynipoidea have complex life-cycles, and that of N. quercusbaccarum is a two-act play known as heterogony - an alternation between a sexual generation and an asexual (agamic) generation.

The Sexual Generation (Spring)
The sexual phase begins in the spring, from January to March or April, asexual females emerge from the leaf litter where they spent the winter. These females lay their eggs in developing Oak buds. This triggers the tree to grow a Currant Gall. Inside these galls, larvae develop rapidly. In June, both males and females emerge. They mate, and the fertilized females then seek out the undersides of maturing oak leaves to lay their eggs.

The Asexual Generation (Summer to Winter)
The eggs laid on the underside of Oak leaves cause the tree to form  Common Spangle Galls. In autumn, before the leaves drop, the spangle galls detach from the leaf and fall to the ground. Inside the gall in the leaf litter, the larva develops into a pupa. Crucially, these larvae develop into females only. No mating is required for the next stage - parthenogenesis. These asexual females emerge the following spring.

This alternating strategy is an evolutionary masterstroke. The sexual generation provides genetic diversity, while the asexual generation allows for a rapid population boom without the "resource cost" of finding a mate during the harsh transition from winter to spring.

Looks like we'll be getting a bumper crop of Spangle Galls this year.
 



Saturday, 14 March 2026

Urban Spiders

A new paper shows that Steatoda nobilis and Zygiella x-notata typically made up more than 80% of the urban spiders in an Irish survey. 

Collier, B. L., Leonard, D., Lyons, K., Dunbar, J. P., Lawton, C., & Dugon, M. M. (2026). Survey of Synanthropic Spiders in Ireland Reveals Expansion and Dominance of the Invasive Noble False Widow Steatoda nobilis in Urban Habitats (Araneae: Theridiidae). Ecology and Evolution, 16(3), e73193.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.73193