data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72847/72847bb12229793693b15f151262358708714b59" alt=""
Monday, 27 May 2019
Saturday, 25 May 2019
Friday, 24 May 2019
Dicymbium nigrum
I have been running a pitfall trap in grass in Leicestershire and over the past week and this has collected several specimens of the following spider, all female. Overall I think the evidence confirms that these are Dicymbium nigrum but I would appreciate confirmation from experts. Click on the images for larger photos:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9bcf4/9bcf4bb50f9f958dbacb8aaaf9f416b974071171" alt=""
Small squares = 1mm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5b5a/f5b5a4c74e9a06cfef1f187a571b53b6ae3443ef" alt=""
Roberts (Roberts, M. (1993) The Spiders of Great Britain and Ireland, Compact Edition (2 vols) Brill) says of the two UK species of Dicymbium:
Numbers of dorsal spines on tibia I, II, III, IV: 2211 - YES
Femur I shorter than prosoma - YES
Fovea clearly visible as darkened groove - YES
No dorsal spines on femur I - YES
Posterior eye row: straight - ?? - see below
Anterior median eyes: distinctly smaller than ALE - ??
Sternum rugose - YES
Position of TmI by range 0.50-0.59 - see below
Metatarsus IV dorsally: trichobothrium present - YES
No dorsal spines on metatarsus I - YES
Tibia IV one dorsal spine - YES
Femur I shorter than prosoma:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a070/9a0701e2a661fd1247d02d10cb1ddfddc4f33887" alt=""
Posterior eye row: straight - looks straight when viewed from above (is that right?)
Anterior median eyes: distinctly smaller than ALE - I'm not sure about this??
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c485a/c485a480a74979d6a53f805603ec0f5e6a6c2463" alt=""
Position of TmI by range: 0.50-0.59: I measure it as 0.64 - ??
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d20b2/d20b253617db4d8fd59decedc3ef14c942fca9da" alt=""
Metatarsus IV dorsally: trichobothrium present:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c76f3/c76f322e0679166b01cb5c0fa43637b90f94c374" alt=""
The epigyne is key to separating female specimens of Dicymbium nigrum and Dicymbium tibiale - these specimens have the short epigynal fissure of D. nigrum rather than the longer fissure of D. tibiale:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f193f/f193f819047fc1d3d910ea3f298c72ecb3399f4b" alt=""
UPDATE: This was kindly conformed by Matt Prince, BAS, with the proviso that it could be Dicymbium brevisetosum, which may or may not be a separate species and which can only be identified in males (none of which I have found yet).
Small squares = 1mm
Roberts (Roberts, M. (1993) The Spiders of Great Britain and Ireland, Compact Edition (2 vols) Brill) says of the two UK species of Dicymbium:
Numbers of dorsal spines on tibia I, II, III, IV: 2211 - YES
Femur I shorter than prosoma - YES
Fovea clearly visible as darkened groove - YES
No dorsal spines on femur I - YES
Posterior eye row: straight - ?? - see below
Anterior median eyes: distinctly smaller than ALE - ??
Sternum rugose - YES
Position of TmI by range 0.50-0.59 - see below
Metatarsus IV dorsally: trichobothrium present - YES
No dorsal spines on metatarsus I - YES
Tibia IV one dorsal spine - YES
Femur I shorter than prosoma:
Posterior eye row: straight - looks straight when viewed from above (is that right?)
Anterior median eyes: distinctly smaller than ALE - I'm not sure about this??
Position of TmI by range: 0.50-0.59: I measure it as 0.64 - ??
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d20b2/d20b253617db4d8fd59decedc3ef14c942fca9da" alt=""
Metatarsus IV dorsally: trichobothrium present:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c76f3/c76f322e0679166b01cb5c0fa43637b90f94c374" alt=""
The epigyne is key to separating female specimens of Dicymbium nigrum and Dicymbium tibiale - these specimens have the short epigynal fissure of D. nigrum rather than the longer fissure of D. tibiale:
UPDATE: This was kindly conformed by Matt Prince, BAS, with the proviso that it could be Dicymbium brevisetosum, which may or may not be a separate species and which can only be identified in males (none of which I have found yet).
Monday, 20 May 2019
Friday, 17 May 2019
Ruby Tiger
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/631ee/631ee623e35e6f48737425ba08a80e06e7841d6d" alt="Ruby Tiger"
For the first time this year it felt like it was worth putting the trap out last night - more species in one night than the rest of the year to date, including this smart Ruby Tiger, Phragmatobia fuliginosa.
Thursday, 16 May 2019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)